Tracy
Barnett
History 525
Research Paper 1st page/outline
“Then each one goes his
own way, and he of the cart is occupied with deep reflections, like
one who has no strength or defence against love which holds him in
its sway. His thoughts are such that he totally forgets himself, and
he knows not whether he is alive or dead, forgetting even his own
name, not knowing whether he is armed or not, or whither he is going
or whence he came. Only one creature he has in mind, and for her his
thought is so occupied that he neither sees nor hears aught else."
-- Chretien de Troys
Lancelot, or the Knight of the Cart
"This much may yet
may I speak; that, as I gazed on her, affection found no room for
other wish. While the everlasting pleasure, that did full on Beatrice
shine, with second view from her fair countenance my gladden'd soul
contended; vanquishing me with a beam of her soft smile, she spake:
"Turn thee, and list. There eyes are not your only Paradise."
-- Dante Aligheri Paradisio
Did the idea of
courtly love change from the Late Medieval period to the Early Modern
period? More importantly, do we see a change in the ways that men
identify themselves as men when we look at examples of courtly love
from the two periods? We see the men fight battles, die, traverse the
Heavens and Hells, risk banishment and worse, all for love. How do
these men see themselves, and what can we find out from the views of
them we find in the poems that house their love?
There have been
historians who have looked at the issue of courtly love during either
of these periods, but whiles we find in their works a great deal of
examination of the roles of women in those works, we do not find as
much on the changing identities of the men that find themselves in
the paramour's role. While the scholarship that has taken place about
women has expanded our views of women in history, it is to our
detriment if we do not also examine the opposite side of coin; the
men that love the women and also find themselves defined by those
women much as the women might find themselves defined by the men
around them.
In her Notes toward a Gendered History of Italian
Literature, Teodolinda Barolini presents a compelling image of
Beatrice, Dante's love who guides him through Heaven in Paradisio.
She explores the issues surrounding the character of Beatrice and
shows in great detail how remarkable of a figure this woman is.
Beatrice occupies a role that is usually reserved for men in that she
speaks, she leads and she is able to give insight and discourse on
theological topics. Indeed, in a traditional reading of Paradisio
Beatrice is thought to represent Theology until she leaves the story
to have Dante led on by another guide.
What could be missing from such a traditional reading is how Dante
took the character of Beatrice and used her as a departure from that
traditions of Courtly Love. I think you can break up this sentence a
bit, and develop your point more clearly and concisely. Beatrice
differs from medieval depictions of the beloved. Dante also departs
from the medieval model of the courtly lover.; he yearns for her, and
he longs for her in much the same way that Lancelot longs for his
Guenevere, but Beatrice provides much more to Dante than an object of
affection: she is for him a window into the divine, and is the manner
by which he gains enlightenment as he travels Heaven. His very faith
is shaped and reformed by the transformations that he watches her
undergo as they rise through the Spheres.Two things: I'm picking up a
level of intellectualism in the courtly union that I suspect is very
unusual in the original high medieval epics. And that would fit with
Dante's Humanism. Also, there is an implied question you must
answer. You imply—if I'm reading you right-- the difference is
in part that Dante the lover seeks spiritual rather than carnal love.
But medieval romances were written in a culture saturated with
Christianity (in some senses more so than the Renaissance culture
that had embraced at least some of old pagan philosophy), and the
love of the medieval courtly lovers was informed by clear carnal
limits and ideas of virtue and nobility. You need to address those
aspects of medieval courtly love—in specifics-- to explain how
the spirituality between Dante and Beatrice is different. I'm hoping
you can come full circle with this paper and tie the intellectual and
discursive to the social, finding in Lancelot's and Dante's different
ways of playing the lover, signs of how elite male roles had changed.
Overall, very good, looks incredibly promising. Try to remember in
your rough draft that your reader does not have all the information
and thus you need to spell out the specifics of your evidence.
History is belabored, prosaic and completely in the details.
A
Outline
I.
Frame Question about possible changes in courtly love
A. Reference Lancelot and Paradisio as the touchstones
for this exploration.
II. Cite previous scholarship on the subject
of courtly love.
A. Paradisio and The
Divine Comedy as an unexplored resource on the possible changes
in courtly love.
III. Examination of the two works
A. Pictures of each of the protagonists
1. How they are defined by the actions they take for their women, and
how they are informed in their choices of action by their women.
Good.
IV. Thesis
A. Changes in courtly love
can be charted by comparing the characters of Dante and Lancelot.
B. These changes point toward a possible willingness for men to be
informed by and guided by the women in their lives. To what? And is
this willingness of real, or is it Beatrice is always an allegory
rather than an actual woman?
1. Possibly only when love is present.